A-DIC, Anti-Democratic International Counterterrorist

Pejorative Sacrosanctity of the Union

The smear has begun and every major media outlet is in fine form supporting the triage. Anarchists won’t let Julian Assange perish because he and Wikileaks are now credible enemies to the hegemonic ‘State of the World’ and are doing a fine job of it. The concern now is over the term media used which identified Wikileaks as “whistle-blower”, though “espionage” and “high-tech terrorist” or digital terrorist are more moving. Unfortunately, the positive information-letting Assange and company have done is being painted by many groups – USA, major media outlets such as the New York Times and Reuters, television network news, and several foreign states – as negative and against the retched motive of “people working to advance the cause of human rights and democracy around the world,” according to the White House. According to the leaks, the people revealed in the thousands of pages are clearly not working toward human rights or democracy, and in fact represent much the opposite.

As long as Assange can evade guilt for the sexual deviance he’s accused of, there isn’t any other criminality involved in his case and he’s able to milk the global whitelight for all it’s worth. Some analysts in the USA government and more conservative media outlets are firmly labeling the group as anti-USA, looking for public support to again burn the witch. Every year there’s someone new charred. Luckily, at the end of 2010 and beginning of 2011, it might not be Arabic-named citizens. Of course, that’s speculation. For it might just be Serbian-born citizens with perverse amounts of explosive-readiness who top USA’s Anti-Democratic International Counterterrorist Sort, or A-DICs, going into the new year. Either way, some trepidatious pejorative will accompany a non-USA country or non-English language soon enough.

Simply writing about the leaked controversy from the opposite side – in support of Assange’s and Manning’s actions – makes the skin hot and anger rise. For once not everything USA is secretive and calm. There’s a steady failure in security, and the story is tending to take center stage while a vital lower socioeconomic collapse is being publicly avoided. The wealthy will continue to keep the money they’ve never worked hard for instead of the playing field leveling out. The government, which unabashedly supports the capitalistic quo, is seen as a security liability, yet the information revealed is rather useless and not-so-disrespectfully unsurprising. The currents events are compelling, are moments when drastic dissolutions could be taking place – USA seen as the villain and sympathizers for the underdog rise; rich, pompous, mostly Anglo citizens brought to tears when they actually have to pay their fair share (and fair by human standards, not economic theorems). The moment is wasted unless more speak out.

Everyone has a say and it comes from a passionate, short-sighted, illogical place. Even USA’s government is quick to admonish Assange and Wikileaks, as is their host Amazon. Before a rational, careful introspection can be made about the use of said information concerning “Teflon” Merkel, “Hot Blonde” Gadhafi, “Epileptic” Jong Il, “Schizo” Karzai, or “Mischievous” Chavez, USA fires back with blind support and hollow moral rhetoric. Instead, it can make fun of itself and turn the situation into satire. Give Ep-Jong il-eptic a call and suggest him as a caricature for a federally-funded film. The MPAA needs some foreign support in case it’s DoS’ed again. Or inform SKarzai-prhenia he’s the new poster child for a new NIH radical, anti-pharmaceutical, opiate-derived remedy for mental illness. Maybe even give Senor Mis-Chav-ious a ring and tell him he’s now been given a Tiffany’s pre-diamond, carbon encrusted red velvet crown to match the revolutionary red he sports as the champion of anti-Western sentiment and Bolivarian revival. Give them their peace of mind through a less violent and contemptuous diplomatic strategy. You’d think a black man would have the humor in him. Unfortunately, his speaker and staff are oozing assholes lacking the muscle to spew back into their own face. Visual metaphors – gotta love USAn sacrosanctity!

It isn’t a joke – the global, diplomatic revelations of cognomens by USA. It’s very serious to consider that much of the vital information is composed so casually, and released in an ever more comfortable manner. There’s premise behind the paranoid panic of describing exactly what Assange is and how to deal with what looks an awful lot like freedom of information and the base ideals for which all democracies are intended to be designed by. Spinsters and unimportant media personalities will incogently duel the disjointed, traditional perspective, turning USA into the political enantiodromia of which we can be sure it has to be. Take the ‘lower socioeconomic failure‘ mentioned above and we see an administration which captured a presidency using an antimonous rhetoric now reversed to the benefit of continued illogical, personal wealth. Again, the joke is on the pejorative “poor”.

Is Assange a lower class savior or a selfish exploiter of government-owned information? Does it change what has happened if he is labeled either? Will this leak develop a standard for the potential “cyber war” so many of us aren’t concerned with? The poor could care less if the rich decimate every last byte representing every last symbolic paper bill signifying every manual effort made by those still having to wash their hands of toil at the end each day, only to go home and make their own food, wash their own clothing, fix their own leaking roofs, till their own cropland, and mend their broken hearts because they’ve been triaged as darker-skinned A-DICs. I ain’t A-DIC! But the joke’s on USA!

Checkmate! King of Chaturanga!

Assange the Anarchist, Anarchy the Achiever

Be enthralled by Julian Assange. Whether it be because USA’s State Department or P.J. Crowley consider him anarchist, or because he’s done something cybernetic-hacker-provocateurs have imagined for years in books and films alike, it doesn’t change the fact he’s nothing more than a tech geek undermining the self-imposed, most powerful force on earth. It’s a proud day to be considered one of his group.

There’s a thrill abound when one and a few persons can obtain and leak classified, secret state information which isn’t so classified or secret. Most USAns and world citizens must be idiotic and dense if they don’t already understand the goals and diplomatic angles their countries traverse to stay dominantly ahead. I.D. foreign leaders, express uncertainties about not-so-terrible possible terrorists, spread lifestyle rumors about dignitaries – all in a day’s work. These actions aren’t surprising and haven’t been for years.

What’s surprising are the extreme measures USAn government and media will go to slant and label, slander and libel, or singularly smear the hierarchical-disabling Australian, while forcibly detaining the Gagaesque agent who proved just how easy it is to gain invaluable political rhetoric. There wasn’t a world-dominating blueprint included in the leaks, merely the same nonsense we usually tend to hear after it’s proved ineffective in the international game of kings.

“Espionage” and “unknown whereabouts” are the most exciting terms associated with Assange’s game. His name is known but he’s tagged with a red A around his neck, yet he can’t be found, is working with a lawyer, was interviewed by “Time”, and gave a shout out to USA Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. Pretty powerful move coming from the digital chess master. Will it amount to anything other than an international threat and manhunt? If Sweden and France are looking for him, it must be serious, right?

The leaks don’t make USA look weak or vulnerable to the world. They merely concretize the cultural western value of scandalmongering as vital. Those with candid careers shouldn’t expect secrecy their forte. But this event is worthless. The only ascertainable triumph is Assange’s consideration as anarchist and his past in relation to Santinketan. Otherwise, the fact remains he’s in need of power satiation and a checkmate, and is somewhat misogynist.

Initially, many jumped on this bandwagon’s horse, but after finding out about Assange’s rape accusations, his previous hacking schemes, and his general recklessness, they fell off. Putting a face to the name has jeopardized the purity of his actions, and while he’s able to galavant worldwide without being caught, the source of his ability to do so remains suspect. In many ways, he fits the same profile as those he’s worked so hard to out. The regime he’s created underground has now unearthed itself, and at the cost of damaging the nature of non-rule existence, they’re a new party in the battle to control the strategy of global information systems.

Assange worked within the system. He may bring it crashing down, but only 250,000 files of it. He’s done what he can and it’s up to the rest of us to contribute what we know to an even deeper sense of alienated decay. It’s not what we know and how we do it that matters, it’s how we remain unknown and do what we’ve never done before. To stay and play in the same match as those blatantly unaware of their effect on spectacles more sweeping than themselves is irresponsible. Another pawn will be sacrificed while the king and queen sit comfortably in e1 and d1.

Tread deeper, but do so without using reference and fact after linear fact falsely representing the truth we all tend to believe. Julian Assange is a small piece on a much larger board. Unfortunately, there isn’t one or even a few individuals controlling the qualitative psychological renderings of discrimination culturally, economically or intellectually. Such hatred and solicitation exists within even the most pacifistic individual. Why be peace-loving if by doing so means to reject conflict, war and violence and create a state of friction? Even unconditional refusal to participate in violence as many have done throughout history supports an oppositional goal.

The notion discrimination and group is the cause of injustice and inequality is lacking in realism. When two individuals of relation or not join in interaction, there’s immediate analysis – even with one who has the response of apathy and avoidance. The conceptual realm of human intellect which we use to devise ration or logic in and out of naturalism is the root cause for our perception of unequal conditions. Simply having, or believing the ability to do as human, arranges every other cognitive function along a hierarchical scale without our awareness of will doing so. With such an impersonal, internal miscommunication, the distinction between me or I and the self firmly plants itself into our brain’s development and process, and divides the wooded frame into black and white reversals.

What does the notion of individualism have to do with the social well-being of USA labeling Assange as anarchist or spy or anti-authoritarian crusader? The comparison forms a distinction between groups, but not a formal disagreement between individuals who do or don’t support another’s worldview. This debacle the media and public so closely pay attention to doesn’t in the least affect who we are or what we did the moment, moments or days following the information leak. Even those most closely related to the information disclosed have few direct effects to surmount. The outcome is only words filling a small, hollowed-out space in name game power. A little flashbulb attention is all these people ask for each day.

The basis for the recognized inadequacies of those making intellectually-critical attacks comes from a lifelong acculturation to success. The upbringings of persons of “color” were surrounded with a newfound sense of achievement, and a motivational attribute to generational accomplishments non-white citizens of USA could foresee for their children and grandchildren. We weren’t taught outgroup homogeneity but instead to reflect the spotlight with effect onto others. In the process of searching for sources of social recognition, we indulged in individualism and ignored ingroup love. The flashbulb was ours in mind, but as we’re less attuned to modern tactics of social alienation and more to chaturanga individual warfare, the desire for attention is gone. Not present in mind, not present in action.

The implicit nature of core semantic value highlights the definition of success, achievement and motivation without dissemination. Anarchy retains an inert core and exemplifies exert value with elementary semantics. Assange typifies the opposite, but again, this is not about camaraderie with him according USA-stated associations. This is a detraction of Assange’s purpose and a reprisal of anarchy’s divergent action against all of their demagoguery. Aiming for leaderlessness and autonomy means using the least of their tekne – core and value in simplicity.

Chess is a modern game where every movement is accounted for and composed. Chaturanga is archaic, uncertain and unwavering in its ability to perplex those with the most advanced and inconsequential survival tools. Within a western frame of game, the detraction and detractor both fail to preserve their status. Without a frame, there’s no language to restrain how a checkmate is achieved.